Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 10:07

“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Harvard doctor lists 6 cancer causing foods: What are their alternatives - Times of India
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Autem nesciunt sint et reprehenderit non fuga beatae et.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
My ex got into a relationship within 2 weeks after a breakup. What should I do?
Russia can stop this any time.
Thank you.
Just in the last 5 years:
Nintendo Switch 2 doubles FPS of Switch 1’s “worst” performing games - Dexerto
What’s next?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
The Highest Prices You Can Get For Pokémon TCG's Destined Rivals - Kotaku
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.